Opinion
2002-00765
Submitted September 30, 2002.
October 21, 2002.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated November 14, 2001, as granted the defendant's cross motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Daniel P. Buttafuoco, Woodbury, N.Y. (Ellen Buchholz of counsel), for appellant.
Cullen and Dykman, LLP, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Timothy J. Flanagan of counsel), for respondent.
Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, HOWARD MILLER, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
At approximately 10:00 P.M. on January 15, 1994, the plaintiff allegedly fell on snow and ice on a sidewalk in front of property owned by the defendant. The plaintiff testified that it snowed all of that day. She maintained that her accident was caused by ice that had formed three days earlier, during a prior storm.
The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff's contention that she injured herself when she slipped on ice from a prior storm is based upon pure speculation and thus is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see Simmons v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 N.Y.2d 972; Bernstein v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 1020; Waingort v. Siegel, 278 A.D.2d 408). Therefore, the Supreme Court correctly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, H. MILLER and COZIER, JJ., concur.