From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jones v. Frazesn

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 7, 2010
2:07-cv-02758 RCT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2010)

Summary

noting that the pro se plaintiff had obtained counsel and denying motion for relief under Rule 60(b) because he had failed to show entitlement to any relief

Summary of this case from Jackson v. PNC Bank

Opinion

2:07-cv-02758 RCT.

July 7, 2010


ORDER


Defendants are ordered to file a response to Plaintiff Alvin Bernard Jones' Motion for Relief from Dismissal or Court Order (FRCP 60(b)) filed with this court on June 25, 2010. Briefing is due within 21 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jones v. Frazesn

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 7, 2010
2:07-cv-02758 RCT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2010)

noting that the pro se plaintiff had obtained counsel and denying motion for relief under Rule 60(b) because he had failed to show entitlement to any relief

Summary of this case from Jackson v. PNC Bank
Case details for

Jones v. Frazesn

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN BERNARD JONES, Plaintiff, v. S. FRAZESN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 7, 2010

Citations

2:07-cv-02758 RCT (E.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2010)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. PNC Bank

The District Court concluded that "[i]t would be inequitable to allow a plaintiff to use one's pro se status,…