From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 13, 1956
228 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1956)

Summary

In Johnson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 228 F.2d 104, the Federal district court held under a similar state of facts: "No Georgia cases are cited and we have been able to find none which go so far as to hold that abusing, insulting, harrowing and cursing an individual constitutes a wrong cognizable under the law of torts in the State of Georgia."

Summary of this case from Miller v. Friedman's Jewelers, Inc.

Opinion

No. 15750.

December 9, 1955. Rehearing Denied January 13, 1956.

John Henry Poole, Tifton, Ga., for appellant.

E. Kontz Bennett, John W. Bennett, Waycross, Ga., Bennett, Pedrick Bennett, Waycross, Ga., of counsel, for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and BROWN, Circuit Judges.


Appellant contends on this appeal from the order of the trial court dismissing his complaint for failing to set out a cause of action that under the Georgia law a party may sue for damages to his "peace, feelings and happiness." No Georgia cases are cited and we have been able to find none which go so far as to hold that abusing, insulting, harrowing and cursing an individual constitutes a wrong cognizable under the law of torts in the state of Georgia. In his order dismissing plaintiff-appellant's complaint the trial court relied on the following authorities: George Muse Clothing Co. v. Lee, 42 Ga. App. 353, 156 S.E. 281; American Oil Co. v. Roper, 64 Ga. App. 743, 14 S.E.2d 145; Anderson v. Fussell, 75 Ga. App. 866, 44 S.E.2d 694; Buice v. Citizens Southern Nat. Bank, 71 Ga. App. 563, 31 S.E.2d 414; Kitchens v. Williams, 52 Ga. App. 422, 183 S.E. 345; Atkinson v. Bibb Manufacturing Co., 50 Ga. App. 434, 178 S.E. 537.

The judgment is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 13, 1956
228 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1956)

In Johnson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 228 F.2d 104, the Federal district court held under a similar state of facts: "No Georgia cases are cited and we have been able to find none which go so far as to hold that abusing, insulting, harrowing and cursing an individual constitutes a wrong cognizable under the law of torts in the State of Georgia."

Summary of this case from Miller v. Friedman's Jewelers, Inc.
Case details for

Johnson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Willie JOHNSON, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 13, 1956

Citations

228 F.2d 104 (5th Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Friedman's Jewelers, Inc.

To the same effect see Anderson v. Fussell, 75 Ga. App. 866 ( 44 S.E.2d 694) where the defendant's words fell…

Brown v. Colonial Stores, Inc.

A considers this insulting. It is not, however, as insulting as to say to a woman: "I am talking to old lady…