From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Asbestos Corporation Ld.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 17, 2000
755 So. 2d 892 (La. 2000)

Summary

In Johnson, the Supreme Court held that, in asbestos cases, corporate witness depositions are limited to areas not covered in previous corporate witnesses' depositions (the "Johnson Rule").

Summary of this case from McMaster v. Union Carbide Corp.

Opinion

No. 2000-CC-0138.

March 17, 2000.

IN RE: Avondale Industries Inc.; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. K, Nos. 1997-14469; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 99-C-2963.


Granted. The judgment of the trial court denying Avondale's motion to quash the deposition is vacated and set aside. Avondale's motion to quash is granted in part. The scope of the deposition will be limited to areas of inquiry which were not covered in any of Avondale's previous depositions, however, follow-up questions will be allowed. In asking follow-up questions it will be plaintiff's burden to provide an appropriate "bridge" question, and plaintiff shall not re-ask questions previously answered. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

WFM

HTL

BJJ

JPV

CDT

KNOLL, J., not on panel.

CALOGERO, C.J., would deny the writ.

KIMBALL, J., would deny the writ.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Asbestos Corporation Ld.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Mar 17, 2000
755 So. 2d 892 (La. 2000)

In Johnson, the Supreme Court held that, in asbestos cases, corporate witness depositions are limited to areas not covered in previous corporate witnesses' depositions (the "Johnson Rule").

Summary of this case from McMaster v. Union Carbide Corp.
Case details for

Johnson v. Asbestos Corporation Ld.

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNIE L. JOHNSON v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Mar 17, 2000

Citations

755 So. 2d 892 (La. 2000)

Citing Cases

McMaster v. Union Carbide Corp.

According to the Relators, the trial court's finding that the alternative discovery methods factor is not…