From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Allegheny County-City Pittsburgh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 31, 2014
Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-857 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-857

10-31-2014

DAVID S. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY-CITY OF PITTSBURGH, KATE BARKMAN, HON. KATHLEEN DURKIN, and HON. ROBERT C. MITCHELL, Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan
ECF Nos. 4, 5, 6, & 8 MEMORANDUM ORDER

The Complaint was filed in the above captioned case on July 7, 2014, after Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was granted. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8), filed on October 8, 2014, recommended that the Complaint (ECF No. 3) be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii). The Report and Recommendation further recommended that Plaintiff's Motions to Compel (ECF No. 4, ECF No. 5) and Petition for Service by the U.S. Marshal (ECF Nos. 6) be dismissed as moot. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made on Plaintiff at AP-8174, One Rockview Place, Bellefonte, PA 16823. Plaintiff was informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that he had fourteen (14) days to file any objections. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation.

After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 31st day of October, 2014,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Complaint filed by Plaintiff David S. Johnson (ECF No. 3) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(iii).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions to Compel (ECF No. 4, ECF No. 5) and Petition for Service by the U.S. Marshal (ECF Nos. 6) are DISMISSED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) of United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan, dated October 8, 2014, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

s/Nora Barry Fischer

NORA BARRY FISCHER

United States District Judge
cc: DAVID S. JOHNSON

AP-8174

One Rockview Place

Bellefonte, PA 16823


Summaries of

Johnson v. Allegheny County-City Pittsburgh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 31, 2014
Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-857 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Johnson v. Allegheny County-City Pittsburgh

Case Details

Full title:DAVID S. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY-CITY OF PITTSBURGH, KATE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-857 (W.D. Pa. Oct. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Williams

Similarly, allegations of conspiracy will not defeat immunity for judicial acts if “the very acts animating…

Leuschen v. Terwilliger

Similarly, allegations of conspiracy will not defeat immunity for judicial acts if “the very acts animating…