In Barkley, the Superior Court remanded the case to the IAB so it could apply the correct causation standard and determine if benefits were owed.
Summary of this case from This & That Servs. Co. v. NievesNo. 556, 2003.
September 28, 2004.
Appeal from the Superior Court, Kent County, CA 02A-01-003.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
In Barkley, the Superior Court remanded the case to the IAB so it could apply the correct causation standard and determine if benefits were owed.
Summary of this case from This & That Servs. Co. v. NievesFull title:JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., Employer/Appellee Below-Appellant, v. ROBERT D…
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Sep 28, 2004
Mr. Nieves’ reliance on Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Barkley , 2004 WL 2239724 (Del. 2004) is misplaced. In…
Food & Water Watch v. Del. Dep't of Nat. Res. & Envtl. ControlDNREC Appl. Certification Interlocutory Appeal at 2. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Barkley, 2004 WL 2239724, at…