From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

John v. Oakland Unified School Dist

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1987
194 Cal.App.3d 1454 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In John R., the court held that "where a parent's delayed discovery of a sexual assault on a minor is due to the continuing effect of the assault, the cause of action for the assault does not accrue until the effect of the underlying tort is no longer operative."

Summary of this case from DeRose v. Carswell
See 1 Summary

Opinion

1987.

[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 1455 — 1469 CONTAINING JOHN R. v. OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]

Reprinted without change in 206 Cal.App.3d 1473, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.

Summaries of

John v. Oakland Unified School Dist

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1987
194 Cal.App.3d 1454 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)

In John R., the court held that "where a parent's delayed discovery of a sexual assault on a minor is due to the continuing effect of the assault, the cause of action for the assault does not accrue until the effect of the underlying tort is no longer operative."

Summary of this case from DeRose v. Carswell
Case details for

John v. Oakland Unified School Dist

Case Details

Full title:John R. v. Oakland Unified School Dist

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1987

Citations

194 Cal.App.3d 1454 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

DeRose v. Carswell

(2a) DeRose follows a number of plaintiffs who have alleged that psychological defense mechanisms caused by…

Doe v. Coffee County Bd. of Educ

Porter v. Porter, 22 Tenn. (3 Hum.) 586, 589 (1842). The Porter v. Porter formulation is generally consistent…

2 Citing Cases