From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jiminez v. Rice

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 22, 2000
222 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2000)

Summary

holding that a pending federal habeas corpus petition does not toll the habeas statute of limitations under § 2244(d)

Summary of this case from Dixon v. Burt

Opinion

No. 99-15574.

Argued and Submitted April 10, 2000, San Francisco, California.

Filed August 22, 2000.


[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS CASE HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN FROM THE BOUND VOLUME AT THE REQUEST OF THE COURT. SEE: 276 F.3d 478.]


Summaries of

Jiminez v. Rice

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 22, 2000
222 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2000)

holding that a pending federal habeas corpus petition does not toll the habeas statute of limitations under § 2244(d)

Summary of this case from Dixon v. Burt
Case details for

Jiminez v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:SEBASTIAN H. JIMINEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BERTRAM RICE, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 22, 2000

Citations

222 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2000)

Citing Cases

Petrick v. Martin

Several have concluded that "State" modifies "other collateral review," thus excluding federal habeas review…

Jiminez v. Rice

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED. The opinion filed…