Summary
finding Equifax's failure to provide certain notices to plaintiff was a harmless omission, as evidence indicates plaintiff was informed of his rights under the FCRA
Summary of this case from McCoy v. S.C. Tiger Manor, LLCOpinion
No. 06-1655.
Submitted: February 14, 2007.
Decided: February 27, 2007.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:03-cv-01290-AW).
Jianqing Wu, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Friedline, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Nathan Daniel Adler, Neuberger, Quinn, Gielen, Rubin Gibber, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jianqing Wu appeals the district court's order granting Equifax's Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 motion for summary judgment and denying Wu's motion for partial summary judgment in this action filed under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wu v. Trans Union, No. 8:03-cv-01290-AW (D.Md. May 2, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.