From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JERMAX, INC. v. AK STEEL CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jun 24, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-4438 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jun. 24, 2010)

Summary

finding that the first-filed rule should not be followed where the second-filing party demanded payment of the debt by a certain date or else the party would "pursue collection of this amount through any and all means available"

Summary of this case from Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Gill

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-4438 (NLH) (KMW).

June 24, 2010


ORDER


For the reasons expressed in this Court's Opinion entered on this date,

IT IS on this 24th day of June 2010, hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Enjoin Defendant's Ohio Action is DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is DENIED.


Summaries of

JERMAX, INC. v. AK STEEL CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Jun 24, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-4438 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jun. 24, 2010)

finding that the first-filed rule should not be followed where the second-filing party demanded payment of the debt by a certain date or else the party would "pursue collection of this amount through any and all means available"

Summary of this case from Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. Gill
Case details for

JERMAX, INC. v. AK STEEL CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:JERMAX, INC. d/b/a GULF NORTHERN TRADING CORP., Plaintiff, v. AK STEEL…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Jun 24, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-4438 (NLH) (KMW) (D.N.J. Jun. 24, 2010)

Citing Cases

Wheaton Indus., Inc. v. Aalto Scientific, Ltd.

Although the California Action was not removed to the Southern District of California until after the New…

Ultraflex Sys. of Fla., Inc. v. Veritev Operating Co.

Accordingly, this Court need not consider U.C.C. § 2-207(3). See Jermax, Inc. v. AK Steel Corp., No. 09-4438,…