From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Nov 23, 2004
862 A.2d 386 (Del. 2004)

Summary

holding that, because the violation of probation (VOP) hearing was neither a criminal prosecution nor a formal trial, the Sixth Amendment does not apply

Summary of this case from Franco v. State

Opinion

No. 133, 2004.

November 23, 2004.

Appeal from the Superior Court, New Castle County, CrA IN03-05-0533 and PN03-05-1787.


Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Nov 23, 2004
862 A.2d 386 (Del. 2004)

holding that, because the violation of probation (VOP) hearing was neither a criminal prosecution nor a formal trial, the Sixth Amendment does not apply

Summary of this case from Franco v. State

declining to apply Crawford because a violation of probation hearing is neither a formal trial nor a criminal prosecution

Summary of this case from Peters v. State

declining to apply Crawford because a violation of probation hearing is neither a formal trial nor a criminal prosecution

Summary of this case from Peters v. State
Case details for

Jenkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE JENKINS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Nov 23, 2004

Citations

862 A.2d 386 (Del. 2004)

Citing Cases

Young v. U.S.

Id. Other courts have recognized the inapplicability of Crawford to probation revocation or its equivalent.…

Peters v. State

mendment does not apply to supervised release revocation hearings);United States v. Rondeau, 430 F.3d 44 (1st…