Summary
dismissing negligent hiring claim where “[p]laintiff alleges only that Defendant should be responsible for the actions of its employees without providing any factual basis that Defendant had “actual or constructive knowledge” of the “conduct or general character” of its security guard”
Summary of this case from Williams v. Coppin State Univ.Opinion
No. 12-1242
06-25-2012
DEREK N. JARVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CONTRACTOR SECURITAS SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee, and MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; ISIAH LEGGETT; MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Defendants.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Victor Arnold, James A. Rothschild, ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:11-cv-00654-AW)
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Victor Arnold, James A. Rothschild, ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court's order granting Contractor Securitas Security's motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. Contractor Securitas Sec., No. 8:11-cv-00654-AW (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED