From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jarre v. Druckmaschinen

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 25, 1994
No. 93-1848 (4th Cir. Mar. 25, 1994)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

affirming dismissal of lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction where there was no evidence the foreign manufacturer defendant "designed the products for the market in Virginia, advertised in Virginia, established channels for providing regular advice to customers in Virginia, or marketed the product through a distributor who agreed to serve as the sales agent in Virginia"

Summary of this case from In re Takata Airbag Prods. Liab.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 93-1848.

March 25, 1994.

Appeal from the E.D.Va., 816 F.Supp. 424.

AFFIRMED.

Summaries of

Jarre v. Druckmaschinen

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 25, 1994
No. 93-1848 (4th Cir. Mar. 25, 1994)

affirming dismissal of lawsuit for lack of personal jurisdiction where there was no evidence the foreign manufacturer defendant "designed the products for the market in Virginia, advertised in Virginia, established channels for providing regular advice to customers in Virginia, or marketed the product through a distributor who agreed to serve as the sales agent in Virginia"

Summary of this case from In re Takata Airbag Prods. Liab.
Case details for

Jarre v. Druckmaschinen

Case Details

Full title:St. Jarre v. Heidelberger Druckmaschinen, A.G

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 25, 1994

Citations

No. 93-1848 (4th Cir. Mar. 25, 1994)

Citing Cases

Tawney v. AC&R Insulation Co.

See CSR, Ltd. v. Taylor, 983 A.2d 492, 505 (Md. 2009) (citing Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 (1958)).…

In re Takata Airbag Prods. Liab.

See, e.g. , Shuker v. Smith & Nephew, PLC , 885 F.3d 760, 780 (3d Cir. 2018) ("declin[ing] to adopt the…

4 Citing Cases