From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Janus v. Regalis Constr., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 4, 2012
11-CV-5788 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2012)

Summary

explaining that liquidated damages under the NYLL are meant to "constitute a penalty" on an employer's willful withholding of wages due, whereas pre-judgment interest is meant "to compensate a plaintiff for the loss of use money"

Summary of this case from Caltenco v. G.H. Food

Opinion

11-CV-5788 (ARR)

09-04-2012

ANDRZEJ JANUS, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. REGALIS CONSTRUCTION, INC., and JAN POMIANEK, Defendants.


NOT FOR ELECTRONIC

OR PRINT PUBLICATION


OPINION & ORDER

ROSS, United States District Judge:

The court has received the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Dkt. No. 15) on the instant case, dated July 23, 2012, from the Honorable Victor V. Pohorelsky, United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed, so the court has reviewed the R&R for clear error on the face of the record. See Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); accord Edwards v. Town of Huntington, No. 05-CV-339, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50074, at *6 (E.D.N.Y. July 11, 2007); McKoy v. Henderson, No. 05 Civ. 1535, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15673, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. March 5, 2007). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error and hereby adopt the R&R, in its entirety, as the opinion of the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 14) is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff against both defendants as follows:

1. Awarding $494.00 in unpaid overtime and liquidated damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq.;
2. $14,873.75 in unpaid overtime and liquidated damages under the New York Labor Law;
3. Prejudgment interest totaling $4,009.96 through May 31, 2012, plus an additional $2.38 per diem from June 1, 2012 through the date of judgment;
4. $10,280 in attorney's fees; and
5. $649.52 in costs.
SO ORDERED.

________________________

Allyne R. Ross

United States District Judge
Dated: September 4, 2012

Brooklyn, New York

MAILING LIST

Robert Wisniewski

& Associates P.C.

225 Broadway

Suite 1020

New York, NY 10007

Regalis Construction Inc.

592 Leonard Street #6

Brooklyn, NY 11222

Jan Pomianek

6640 60PL

Ridgewood, NY 11385

Jan Pomianek

592 Leonard Street

Brooklyn, NY 11222

Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky


Summaries of

Janus v. Regalis Constr., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 4, 2012
11-CV-5788 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2012)

explaining that liquidated damages under the NYLL are meant to "constitute a penalty" on an employer's willful withholding of wages due, whereas pre-judgment interest is meant "to compensate a plaintiff for the loss of use money"

Summary of this case from Caltenco v. G.H. Food

explaining that liquidated damages under the NYLL are meant to "constitute a penalty" on an employer's willful withholding of wages due, whereas pre-judgment interest is meant "to compensate a plaintiff for the loss of use money"

Summary of this case from Romero v. Rung Charoen Sub, Inc.
Case details for

Janus v. Regalis Constr., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANDRZEJ JANUS, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 4, 2012

Citations

11-CV-5788 (ARR) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 4, 2012)

Citing Cases

Saucedo v. On the Spot Audio Corp.

Although plaintiff was not paid overtime in violation of both the FLSA and the New York labor Law, he is not…

Sanchez v. Ms. Wine Shop

This is because New York State views liquidated damages as punitive, not compensatory; prejudgment interest…