From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

James v. Baldwin Bone Joint, P.C.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Nov 4, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00254-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Nov. 4, 2009)

Summary

finding § 6–5–551 pleading standard met where complaint “alleged that the treatment took place in close proximity to the June 8, 2007 surgery and ... identified the act which Dr. Stuber allegedly failed to perform, and the damage which he allegedly suffered as a result”

Summary of this case from Brown v. Endo Pharm., Inc.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00254-KD-B.

November 4, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), dated October 6, 2009, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, defendants' motions to dismiss are DENIED.


Summaries of

James v. Baldwin Bone Joint, P.C.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Nov 4, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00254-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Nov. 4, 2009)

finding § 6–5–551 pleading standard met where complaint “alleged that the treatment took place in close proximity to the June 8, 2007 surgery and ... identified the act which Dr. Stuber allegedly failed to perform, and the damage which he allegedly suffered as a result”

Summary of this case from Brown v. Endo Pharm., Inc.
Case details for

James v. Baldwin Bone Joint, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:AUSTIN E. JAMES, Plaintiff, v. BALDWIN BONE JOINT, P.C., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00254-KD-B (S.D. Ala. Nov. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Endo Pharm., Inc.

Thus, even if plaintiff did engage in deliberately manipulative pleading tactics, as defendant posits, Endo…