From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. Mostow

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 22, 2014
113 A.D.3d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-01-22

David B. JACOBS, appellant, v. Michael H. MOSTOW, et al., respondents, et al., defendant.

David B. Jacobs, Dix Hills, N.Y., appellant pro se. Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Stanley A. Camhi of counsel), for respondents.


David B. Jacobs, Dix Hills, N.Y., appellant pro se. Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Stanley A. Camhi of counsel), for respondents.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated January 18, 2012, as denied those branches of his motion which were to consolidate this action with an action entitled Jacobs v. Mostow, filed in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 7715/07, to amend the caption to add certain parties appearing in the action under Index No. 7715/07, to vacate all prior orders, decisions, and a judgment entered in that action pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4), and for summary judgment on the complaint, and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Michael H. Mostow, Roosevelt Union Free School District, Board of Education of the Roosevelt Union Free School District, Glenn Simmons, Mark Davis, Marsha Bedard, Stephen Budhu, Rodney Romain, Hossein Zamani, Carolyn Gear, Carolyn Ruffin, and Horace Williams which was for summary judgment dismissing the first, second, and third causes of action insofar as asserted against them.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to consolidate this action with an action entitled Jacobs v. Mostow, filed in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 7715/07 (hereinafter the 2007 action). Consolidation requires two pending actions ( seeCPLR 602). Since the 2007 action was dismissed, and that dismissal was affirmed on appeal, there is no pending 2007 action to consolidate with this action.

The Supreme Court also properly granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendants Michael H. Mostow, Roosevelt Union Free School District, Board of Education of the Roosevelt Union Free School District, Glenn Simmons, Mark Davis, Marsha Bedard, Stephen Budhu, Rodney Romain, Hossein Zamani, Carolyn Gear, Carolyn Ruffin and Horace Williams (hereinafter collectively the District defendants) which was for summary judgment dismissing the first, second, and third causes of action insofar as asserted against them. The District defendants established, prima facie, that they had sufficient reason to remove the plaintiff from his teaching duties on March 23, 2000, and require him to undergo a psychiatric examination pursuant to Education Law § 913 ( cf. Matter of Patchogue–Medford Congress of Teachers v. Board of Educ. of Patchogue–Medford Union Free School Dist., 70 N.Y.2d 57, 69–70, 517 N.Y.S.2d 456, 510 N.E.2d 325). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court. DICKERSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jacobs v. Mostow

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 22, 2014
113 A.D.3d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Jacobs v. Mostow

Case Details

Full title:David B. JACOBS, appellant, v. Michael H. MOSTOW, et al., respondents, et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 22, 2014

Citations

113 A.D.3d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
113 A.D.3d 729
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 328

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Elias-Tejada

See Progressive Ins. Co. v. Countrywide Ins. Co., supra. Although plaintiff argues that both actions arise…