From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 19, 1992
598 So. 2d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

reversing conviction where police officer revealed that defendant had "an arrest record and was recently released from prison"

Summary of this case from Willis v. State

Opinion

No. 91-1061.

May 19, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Thomas M. Carney, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Howard K. Blumberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Marc E. Brandes, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.


We reverse Jackson's convictions because, over objection, an investigating police officer was permitted to recount that defendant had "an arrest record and was recently released from prison." See McGuire v. State, 584 So.2d 89 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); McCall v. State, 463 So.2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Houston v. State, 360 So.2d 468 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Perkins v. State, 349 So.2d 776 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). The other evidence of guilt consisted entirely of non-conclusive eyewitness identification so we cannot say that the error was harmless, State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986), and a new trial is therefore required.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 19, 1992
598 So. 2d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

reversing conviction where police officer revealed that defendant had "an arrest record and was recently released from prison"

Summary of this case from Willis v. State
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE JACKSON, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 19, 1992

Citations

598 So. 2d 303 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Witherspoon v. State

We agree that the state's evidence against the defendant was strong, but it was not uncontradicted. The jury…

Willis v. State

For the officer to tell the jury that he may have confused this photograph with other photographs taken of…