Summary
dismissing petition as moot because "the determination has been administratively reversed"
Summary of this case from Jackson v. PolizziOpinion
527058
04-18-2019
Thomas Jackson, Marcy, petitioner pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Thomas Jackson, Marcy, petitioner pro se.
Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENTProceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record, and the mandatory $ 5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ortiz v. Venettozzi, 167 A.D.3d 1200, 1201, 87 N.Y.S.3d 909 [2018] ; Matter of Cunningham v. Annucci, 166 A.D.3d 1198, 1198, 84 N.Y.S.3d 918 [2018] ).
Garry, P.J., Lynch, Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.