Summary
explaining that the district court's decision will not be disturbed if supported by conflicting, but substantial evidence
Summary of this case from Colonial Real Estate P'ship, Ltd. v. Morgan (In re Carver)Opinion
No. 8354
October 20, 1976
Appeal from the First Judicial District Court, Carson City; Frank B. Gregory, J.
John J. McCune and Paul J. Williams, Reno, for Appellant.
Robert A. Grayson, Carson City, for Respondent.
OPINION
After hearing argument of counsel, reviewing the record and considering the briefs on file herein, we conclude there is substantial, though conflicting, evidence to support the trial court's findings.
Where a trial court, sitting without a jury, makes a determination upon conflicting evidence, that determination will not be disturbed on appeal where, as here, it is supported by substantial evidence. Alves v. Bumguardner, 91 Nev. 799, 544 P.2d 436 (1975); County of Clark v. Lucas, 91 Nev. 263, 534 P.2d 499 (1975); Fletcher v. Fletcher, 89 Nev. 540, 516 P.2d 103 (1973).
Affirmed.