Summary
rejecting the defendants' arguments that the plaintiff was necessarily limited to a lower recovery of attorneys' fees because of plaintiff's contingent-fee agreement with its attorneys
Summary of this case from Selleck v. Keith M. Evans Ins., Inc.Opinion
No. WD 53343 Consolidated with WD 53409 53607
OPINION FILED: October 14, 1997
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, THE HONORABLE C. WILLIAM KRAMER, JUDGE.
Steven G. Sakoulas-Steven R. Schanker (Natural Father), BORTNICK, KOMOROSKI, McKEON SAKOULAS, Brian C. Fries (Natural Mother), KENNER JAMES Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant[s].
Kyla Grove (Guardian Ad Litem), Robert M. Schieber, Kansas City, Missouri, for respondent[s].
Before Howard, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, JJ.
ORDER
Appellants C.G. and R.G. appeal the trial court's order terminating their parental rights to their four children. They claim that the trial court did not have clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support its judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no reversible error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have supplied the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).