Opinion
No. 17-1092
06-02-2017
In re: SHAUN ROSIERE, Petitioner
HLD-006
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for District of New Jersey
(Related to D.N.J. Crim. Nos. 1-08-cr-00629-005; 1-09-cr-00720-001) Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
March 2, 2017 Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE and FUENTES, Circuit Judges OPINION PER CURIAM
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent. --------
Shaun Rosiere seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to rule on three motions pending in the underlying criminal matter concerning the terms of his supervised release. By order entered April 5, 2017, the District Court denied each motion. In light of the District Court's action, this mandamus petition no longer presents a live controversy. Therefore, we will dismiss it as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996) ("If developments occur during the course of adjudication that eliminate a plaintiff's personal stake in the outcome of a suit or prevent a court from being able to grant the requested relief, the case must be dismissed as moot.").