From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Pettaway

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Oct 2, 2015
618 F. App'x 164 (3d Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-2978

10-02-2015

IN RE: WAYNE PETTAWAY, Petitioner


BLD-341

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
September 17, 2015
Before: AMBRO, JORDAN and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges
OPINION PER CURIAM

This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.

Wayne Pettaway, a state prisoner, filed this pro se petition for a writ of mandamus claiming that he has been "unlawfully incarcerated without the proper documentation such [as] a commi[t]ment order or a sentencing order." He seeks immediate release from state prison and "redress" for his unlawful confinement. We will deny the petition.

Our jurisdiction derives from 28 U.S.C. § 1651, which grants us the power to "issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of [our jurisdiction] and agreeable to the usages and principles of law." A writ of mandamus is an extreme remedy that is invoked only in extraordinary situations. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). To justify the use of this extraordinary remedy, a petitioner must show both a clear and indisputable right to the writ, and that he has no other adequate means to obtain the relief desired. See Haines v. Liggett Grp. Inc., 975 F.2d 81, 89 (3d Cir. 1992).

Pettaway is not entitled to this extraordinary relief. Pettaway is seeking an order from the District Court compelling state action with request to a state prisoner. A federal court . . . may not use a writ of mandamus to compel a state court to exercise a jurisdiction entrusted to it." In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 654 F.2d 268, 278 (3d Cir. 1981). Moreover, Pettaway has other adequate means to challenge his incarceration—either in state court or through a properly filed petition for habeas corpus, as appropriate.

We, of course, do not make any comment on the viability of any other motion or petition for relief, including a habeas petition, that Pettaway may choose to file. --------

For these reasons, we will deny the mandamus petition.


Summaries of

In re Pettaway

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Oct 2, 2015
618 F. App'x 164 (3d Cir. 2015)
Case details for

In re Pettaway

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: WAYNE PETTAWAY, Petitioner

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 2, 2015

Citations

618 F. App'x 164 (3d Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Wilder v. New Jersey

3. Though it is not clear exactly what action Petitioner wants this Court to take, the Court does note that…