From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re NVIDIA Corp. Derivative Litigation

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Dec 24, 2008
No. C 06-06110 SBA (N.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2008)

Summary

approving an award for attorney's fees in connection with a settlement comprised largely of corporate governance reforms because “strong corporate governance is fundamental to the economic well-being and success of a corporation”

Summary of this case from In re Johnson & Johnson Derivative Litig.

Opinion

No. C 06-06110 SBA.

December 24, 2008


ORDER [Docket No. 163]


The Court issued two orders in this matter on December 22, 2008. In Docket No. 164, the Court set a hearing for final approval of the parties' joint settlement proposal for this derivative class action, for January 27, 2009, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom 3 of the United States Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, 3rd Floor, Oakland, California, 94612. See Docket No. 164. The Court attempted the same in Docket No. 163, an Amended Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement, but the address is twice incorrectly indicated as 1302 Clay Street. Docket No. 163 at 6 ¶ 2, 8 ¶ 9. The street address should read "1301" Clay Street.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re NVIDIA Corp. Derivative Litigation

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Dec 24, 2008
No. C 06-06110 SBA (N.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2008)

approving an award for attorney's fees in connection with a settlement comprised largely of corporate governance reforms because “strong corporate governance is fundamental to the economic well-being and success of a corporation”

Summary of this case from In re Johnson & Johnson Derivative Litig.
Case details for

In re NVIDIA Corp. Derivative Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re NVIDIA CORP. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, This Document Relates to: ALL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Dec 24, 2008

Citations

No. C 06-06110 SBA (N.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

Lloyd v. Gupta

"In order to grant preliminary approval, the Court need only conclude that the settlement of the claims on…

In re Synchronoss Techs., Inc. Stockholder Derivative Demand Refused Litig.

A. The Settlement Confers a Substantial Benefit on the Corporation Case law makes clear that corporate…