From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Markquel S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 15, 2012
93 A.D.3d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Summary

finding that a pencil constituted a dangerous instrument when used to repeatedly stab the victim

Summary of this case from Distefano v. Sedita

Opinion

2012-03-15

In re MARKQUEL S., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.Presentment Agency.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Raymond E. Rogers of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Dona B. Morris of counsel), for presentment agency.


Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Raymond E. Rogers of counsel), for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Dona B. Morris of counsel), for presentment agency.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., FRIEDMAN, RICHTER, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered on or about January 20, 2011, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and menacing in the second degree, and placed him on enhanced supervision probation for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). Appellant tried to stab a fellow student with a pencil, and when the victim tried to shield his face by putting up his hands, appellant stabbed at the victim again. This time the pencil lodged in the victim's wrist, caused a painful puncture wound, and had to be removed by the school nurse. This evidence established all of the elements of the offenses at issue, and it undermines appellant's argument that he was merely engaging in horseplay.

The pencil was a dangerous instrument ( see Penal Law § 10.00[13] ) because it was readily capable of causing serious physical injury under the circumstances of its use, regardless of the level of injury actually inflicted ( see People v. Molnar, 234 A.D.2d 988, 652 N.Y.S.2d 186 [1996], lv. denied 89 N.Y.2d 1038, 659 N.Y.S.2d 869, 681 N.E.2d 1316 [1997] ). Appellant's intent to cause physical injury, at least, could be readily inferred from his actions ( see People v. Getch, 50 N.Y.2d 456, 465, 429 N.Y.S.2d 579, 407 N.E.2d 425 [1980] ), and the evidence established that physical injury resulted ( see People v. Chiddick, 8 N.Y.3d 445, 834 N.Y.S.2d 710, 866 N.E.2d 1039 [2007]; People v. Guidice, 83 N.Y.2d 630, 636, 612 N.Y.S.2d 350, 634 N.E.2d 951 [1994] ). The evidence also established menacing, in that appellant placed the victim in reasonable fear of physical injury.


Summaries of

In re Markquel S.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 15, 2012
93 A.D.3d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

finding that a pencil constituted a dangerous instrument when used to repeatedly stab the victim

Summary of this case from Distefano v. Sedita
Case details for

In re Markquel S.

Case Details

Full title:In re MARKQUEL S., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 15, 2012

Citations

93 A.D.3d 505 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
940 N.Y.S.2d 247
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1869

Citing Cases

People v. Brown

There is no reason to disturb the jury's determination that the hypodermic needle used to threaten one victim…

People v. Adorno

The prosecutor's remark was a single sentence that did not dwell on any of the particulars of the voir dire.…