From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Maples

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 8, 2008
No. 13-08-00524-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2008)

Opinion

No. 13-08-00524-CV

Opinion delivered and Filed October 8, 2008.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices RODRIGUEZ and BENAVIDES.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).


Relators, James M. Maples and Kathy Maples, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for immediate temporary relief in the above cause on September 3, 2008. On September 4, 2008, this Court granted the motion for immediate temporary relief and ordered stayed the trial court's order of August 29, 2008 setting a show cause hearing. The Court also requested that real parties in interest, Johnny Partain and Teresa C. Partain, file a response to relator's petition for writ of mandamus on or before September 19, 2008. Such response has been duly filed herein.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the stay of the trial court's order of August 29, 2008, is hereby ordered LIFTED and the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).


Summaries of

In re Maples

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 8, 2008
No. 13-08-00524-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2008)
Case details for

In re Maples

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JAMES M. MAPLES AND KATHY MAPLES

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Oct 8, 2008

Citations

No. 13-08-00524-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Partain v. State

, In re Partain, No. 13-16-00516-CV, 2016 WL 5846549, at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Sept. 3, 2016, orig.…

Partain v. Estate of Maples

See, e.g., Partain v. Isgur, 390 Fed. Appx. 326, 327 (5th Cir. 2010) (per curiam); In re Maples, 529 F.3d…