Summary
stating that, “to preserve an issue for appellate review,” a party “must have presented to the trial court a timely request, objection, or motion, stating the specific grounds for the ruling” and must have “obtain[ed] a ruling upon the party's request, objection, or motion”
Summary of this case from Gordon v. GordonOpinion
No. 82P12.
2012-04-12
In the Matter of Robert Dale HUTCHINSON, appeal by State of NC.
Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. Andrew DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hutchinson, Robert Dale.
Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina. Andrew DeSimone, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hutchinson, Robert Dale. Jon David, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 27th of February 2012 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of April 2012.”
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th of February 2012 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th of April 2012.”