From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Howerton

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Sep 3, 1982
23 B.R. 58 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1982)

Summary

holding that attorney may not be compensated from the estate for work performed in connection with securing the debtor's exemptions

Summary of this case from In re Quisenberry

Opinion

Bankruptcy No. 481-00571.

September 3, 1982.


SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION


The Trustee in this Chapter 7 case objected to the Debtor's claimed exemption of their Individual Retirement Annuities held by a life insurance company. This Court entered a memorandum opinion on July 14, 1982 holding the retirement plans were not exempt. 21 B.R. 621. Debtors now move for a new trial and for the Court to make additional findings of fact. I have considered those motions and both are denied for the reasons stated in the earlier memorandum opinion.

Finally, Debtors request an award of attorney's fees and expenses pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 330 to Debtors' attorneys for all necessary appeals of the decision of this Court. Under the repealed Bankruptcy Act, the bankrupt's attorney was compensated from the estate only for services rendered in administering the estate and in carrying out provisions of the Act. Conrad, Rubin and Lesser v. Pender, 289 U.S. 472, 53 S.Ct. 703, 77 L.Ed. 1327 (1933); In re Evenrod Perfumer, 67 F.2d 878 (2d Cir. 1933). Setting aside an exemption for the benefit of the bankrupt did not fall within either category and attorney fees were therefore not awarded from the estate assets for such services. 3A Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 62.31 [3.5] (14th ed. 1975). The Code makes no change in the criteria for services compensable from estate assets. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 330.04[3] (15th ed. 1982). This result is analogous to 11 U.S.C. § 522(c) which places the financial burden on the debtor, rather than the estate, for protecting exemptions which inure solely to his benefit. Debtors' motion for attorney's fees and costs is therefore denied.


Summaries of

In re Howerton

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Sep 3, 1982
23 B.R. 58 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1982)

holding that attorney may not be compensated from the estate for work performed in connection with securing the debtor's exemptions

Summary of this case from In re Quisenberry

holding that attorney may not be compensated from the estate for work performed in connection with securing the debtor's exemptions

Summary of this case from In re Condit
Case details for

In re Howerton

Case Details

Full title:In re James Douglas HOWERTON and wife, Blanche Howerton, Debtors

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division

Date published: Sep 3, 1982

Citations

23 B.R. 58 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1982)

Citing Cases

Goff v. Taylor

See, e.g., Bank of Dallas v. Republic National Bank of Dallas, 540 S.W.2d 499 (Tex.Civ.App.-Waco 1976, writ…

In re Office Products of America, Inc.

Section 330 permits payment as an expense of administration of "reasonable" compensation to the "debtor's…