Summary
denying mandamus with no additional explanation other than simply being “of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought”
Summary of this case from In re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Opinion
No. 04-12-00192-CV
04-04-2012
IN RE HEALTH CARE UNLIMITED, INC.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Original Mandamus Proceeding
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 08-04-14585-CV, styled Gi Anna Valdemar, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Belinda Valdemar, Deceased, et al. v. Health Care Unlimited, Inc., et al., pending in the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas, the Honorable Richard C. Terrell presiding.
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On March 28, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM