Opinion
No. 04-04-00202-CV
Delivered and Filed: November 3, 2004.
Appeal from the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2002-Juv-00644, Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding.
Affirmed.
Sitting: Alma L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice, Catherine STONE, Justice, Sarah B. DUNCAN, Justice.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
F.C. was found guilty of delinquent conduct based on the possession of a prohibited weapon on school premises and was placed on probation. The State subsequently moved to modify the disposition, alleging F.C. violated the conditions of his probation. F.C. pled true to the allegations. Following a hearing, the trial court revoked F.C.'s probation and ordered him committed to the custody of the Texas Youth Commission.
F.C.'s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 299 (Tex. 1998) (applying Anders in juvenile proceedings); In re A.L.H., 974 S.W.2d 359, 360-61 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (same).
A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant and his guardian, who were advised of appellant's right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).