From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Disqualification of Badger

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 10, 1989
47 Ohio St. 3d 604 (Ohio 1989)

Summary

In Badger, supra, Informal Opinion No. 1477 (1981) of the ABA Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility was relied upon to support the disqualification of a judge who was represented, in a matter relating to his official position, by an attorney who was also counsel in a case pending before Judge Badger. It was said that "`* * * when a private lawyer is currently representing a judge, even in a matter involving the judge's official position or conduct, the judge should not sit in a case in which a litigant is represented by the lawyer * * *'."

Summary of this case from In re Disqualification of Morgan

Opinion

No. 88-AP-114

Submitted and decided February 10, 1989.

Judges — Affidavit of disqualification — Representation of judge in unrelated matter by counsel for defendant will be grounds for disqualification even where other matter pertains to judge's official position and where judge did not personally select counsel.

ON AFFIDAVIT OF DISQUALIFICATION.


The affidavit of disqualification herein was filed by Michael L. Silverstein, counsel for the plaintiffs, seeking the disqualification of Judge Thomas D. Badger on the ground that Judge Badger is and has been represented in unrelated matters by counsel for one of the defendants in the instant case.

There is nothing to suggest that Judge Badger is biased or prejudiced in favor of or against any party or counsel. The unrelated case pertains to the judge's official position, and Judge Badger had no involvement in the selection of the attorney who represents him.

However, Informal Opinion No. 1477 (1981) of the American Bar Association Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility concludes that "* * * when a private lawyer is currently representing a judge, even in a matter involving the judge's official position or conduct, the judge should not sit in a case in which a litigant is represented by the lawyer * * *." ABA/BNA Lawyer's Manual on Professional Conduct (1986) 801:329.

This opinion will be followed in the instant case and Judge Badger should participate no further in these proceedings. I will assign a visiting judge to preside in this matter.


Summaries of

In re Disqualification of Badger

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 10, 1989
47 Ohio St. 3d 604 (Ohio 1989)

In Badger, supra, Informal Opinion No. 1477 (1981) of the ABA Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility was relied upon to support the disqualification of a judge who was represented, in a matter relating to his official position, by an attorney who was also counsel in a case pending before Judge Badger. It was said that "`* * * when a private lawyer is currently representing a judge, even in a matter involving the judge's official position or conduct, the judge should not sit in a case in which a litigant is represented by the lawyer * * *'."

Summary of this case from In re Disqualification of Morgan
Case details for

In re Disqualification of Badger

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DISQUALIFICATION OF BADGER: ASHTON ET AL. v. AMG INDUSTRIES ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 10, 1989

Citations

47 Ohio St. 3d 604 (Ohio 1989)
546 N.E.2d 929

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Ames v. Portage Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs (In re Disqualification of Reinbold)

Therefore, the chief justice and the Board of Professional Conduct have long advised that a judge should…

Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. v. Roche Diagnostics GmbH

Included among the exceptions is that "disqualification may not be necessary if the judge is merely a nominal…