From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Beller

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jul 3, 2002
802 A.2d 340 (D.C. 2002)

Summary

finding violation of Rule 8.1(b)

Summary of this case from In re Steinberg

Opinion

No. 02-BG-426

Decided July 3, 2002

On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility.

Before Farrell and Washington, Associate Judges, and King, Senior Judge.


The Board on Professional Responsibility ("Board") recommends that respondent, Margaret A. Beller, be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for thirty days as a result of her admitted failure to respond to repeated inquiries from Bar Counsel and the Board regarding three ethical complaints. By failing to respond to those inquiries and comply with the Board's orders to respond, respondent violated Rules 8.1 (b) and 8.4 (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2 (b)(3). The Board furthermore recommends that reinstatement be conditioned on respondent's full compliance with Bar Counsel's requests for information regarding the three complaints.

Bar Counsel has informed the court that she takes no exception to the Board's report and recommendation. Respondent has not filed any exceptions to the Board's report and recommendation. Thus, we give heightened deference to the Board's recommendation. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (g)(2); In re Delaney, 697 A.2d 1212, 1214 (D.C. 1997).

This court will accept the Board's findings as long as they are supported by substantial evidence in the record. D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (g)(1). Moreover, we will impose the sanction recommended by the Board "unless to do so would foster a tendency toward inconsistent dispositions for comparable conduct or would otherwise be unwarranted." Id. We find substantial support in the record for the Board's findings, and, accordingly, we accept them. Likewise, we adopt the sanction recommended by the Board, as it is not inconsistent with discipline imposed in similar cases. See, e.g., In re Mattingly, 723 A.2d 1219 (D.C. 1999). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Margaret A. Beller is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for the period of thirty days, with reinstatement conditioned on her full cooperation with Bar Counsel in these matters. We direct respondent's attention to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g), and their effect on her eligibility for reinstatement. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (c).

So ordered.


Summaries of

In re Beller

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jul 3, 2002
802 A.2d 340 (D.C. 2002)

finding violation of Rule 8.1(b)

Summary of this case from In re Steinberg

imposing 30-day suspension

Summary of this case from In re Mabry
Case details for

In re Beller

Case Details

Full title:In re Margaret A. Beller, Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the District…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 3, 2002

Citations

802 A.2d 340 (D.C. 2002)

Citing Cases

In re Steinberg

See, e.g., In re Beller, 802 A.2d 340 (D.C. 2002); In re Beaman, 775 A.2d 1063 (D.C. 2001); In re Giles, 741…

In re Owusu

In re Burnett, 878 A.2d 1291, 1292 (D.C. 2005) (per curiam). See also In re Beller, 802 A.2d 340 (D.C. 2002)…