From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Barry

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 7, 2004
855 A.2d 568 (N.J. 2004)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

stating that an appellate court's ability to invoke original jurisdiction "is permissive" and "it is correspondingly discretionary"

Summary of this case from N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. S.F.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

September 7, 2004

ORDER

JOSEPH M. BARRY of HOBOKEN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, having pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey to four counts of making illegal payments concerning programs receiving federal funds, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. 666(a)(2) and 2, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-13(b)(1), JOSEPH M. BARRY is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that JOSEPH M. BARRY comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that JOSEPH M. BARRY be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension.

Summaries of

In re Barry

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 7, 2004
855 A.2d 568 (N.J. 2004)

stating that an appellate court's ability to invoke original jurisdiction "is permissive" and "it is correspondingly discretionary"

Summary of this case from N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. S.F.
Case details for

In re Barry

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH M. BARRY AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Sep 7, 2004

Citations

855 A.2d 568 (N.J. 2004)
855 A.2d 568

Citing Cases

N.J. Div. of Child Prot. & Permanency v. S.F.

Furthermore, the Law Guardian's request would require us to make findings of fact, which we also decline to…

1 Citing Cases