Summary
imposing filing restrictions on Aranda-Tercero based on his "repeated[] abuse[]" of the Supreme Court's process
Summary of this case from Tercero v. ComisarioOpinion
No. 05-5456.
October 3, 2005.
Miscellaneous Orders
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in non-criminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.