From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Aranda

U.S.
Oct 3, 2005
546 U.S. 810 (2005)

Summary

imposing filing restrictions on Aranda-Tercero based on his "repeated[] abuse[]" of the Supreme Court's process

Summary of this case from Tercero v. Comisario

Opinion

No. 05-5456.

October 3, 2005.


Miscellaneous Orders

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in non-criminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein.


Summaries of

In re Aranda

U.S.
Oct 3, 2005
546 U.S. 810 (2005)

imposing filing restrictions on Aranda-Tercero based on his "repeated[] abuse[]" of the Supreme Court's process

Summary of this case from Tercero v. Comisario
Case details for

In re Aranda

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ARANDA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 3, 2005

Citations

546 U.S. 810 (2005)
126 S. Ct. 250

Citing Cases

Tercero v. Comisario

See, e.g., In re Aranda, 546 U.S. 810 (2005) (imposing filing restrictions on Aranda-Tercero based on his…