From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Interest of L.S.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 9, 1990
560 So. 2d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

reversing based on lack of written consent without addressing whether the intern was supervised

Summary of this case from In re Denzel W

Opinion

No. 89-1328.

May 9, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Lawrence L. Korda, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Susan D. Cline, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant — L.S.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John M. Koenig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee — State.


Appellant seeks review of his adjudication of delinquency and commitment and claims that unlike a rose, an attorney by any other name is not an attorney.

What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet, act II, sc. ii, 1. 43.

We reverse. Appellant was represented by a certified legal intern. The record is devoid of any written document whereby appellant gave his consent to be so represented. Thus the record is insufficient to establish that appellant understood his legal options and that he knowingly waived the right to be represented by an attorney. In re C.B., 546 So.2d 447, 448 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

The error was not negated by the fact that the intern became a licensed Florida attorney twelve days before she represented appellant at his adjudicatory hearing. A juvenile is entitled to legal representation at each stage of a delinquency proceedings. Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.290. The intern represented appellant at various stages of the case. His detention hearings were handled by her. She entered appellant's plea of not guilty, conducted discovery and rejected the juvenile division judge's offer of a concurrent commitment. Her motions for continuances waived appellant's "speedy trial" rights.

Accordingly, we reverse appellant's adjudication and commitment and remand for a new adjudicatory hearing. We direct that appellant's delinquency proceedings be reinitiated and that an attorney be appointed to represent him at each stage thereof.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW ADJUDICATORY HEARING WITH DIRECTIONS.

DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur in result only.


Summaries of

In re Interest of L.S.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 9, 1990
560 So. 2d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

reversing based on lack of written consent without addressing whether the intern was supervised

Summary of this case from In re Denzel W

reversing based on lack of written consent without addressing whether the intern was supervised for the various proceedings

Summary of this case from Reigelsperger v. State

reversing based on lack of written consent

Summary of this case from Duval v. State
Case details for

In re Interest of L.S.

Case Details

Full title:IN THE INTEREST OF L.S., A CHILD

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 9, 1990

Citations

560 So. 2d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

United States v. English

Id. Another case cited by English is In the Interest of L.S., 560 So. 2d 425 (Fla.Ct.App. 1990). In this…

Reigelsperger v. State

adjudication because the juvenile did not execute a written waiver of his right to be represented by an…