From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Kline

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 11, 2008
Civil Case No. 06-cv-01946-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2008)

Summary

In Hudson v. Kline, 9 Gratt. 379, the authorities are elaborately reviewed by Moncure, judge, and the rule thus announced: " If a bill does not state a case proper for relief in equity, the court will dismiss it at the hearing, though no objection has been taken to the jurisdiction by the defendant in his pleadings."

Summary of this case from Green v. Massie

Opinion

Civil Case No. 06-cv-01946-LTB-BNB.

April 11, 2008


ORDER


This case is before me upon the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that the case should be dismissed without prejudice for repeated failure to comply with orders of this Court. The recommendation was issued and served on March 28, 2008 (Doc 65). Plaintiff has now filed timely written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc 72). I have considered the Plaintiff's objections in light of the Magistrate Judge's recommendation, the record, and file in this action. Upon such de novo review, I conclude that the recommendation is correct. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for repeated failure to comply with orders of this Court.


Summaries of

Hudson v. Kline

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 11, 2008
Civil Case No. 06-cv-01946-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2008)

In Hudson v. Kline, 9 Gratt. 379, the authorities are elaborately reviewed by Moncure, judge, and the rule thus announced: " If a bill does not state a case proper for relief in equity, the court will dismiss it at the hearing, though no objection has been taken to the jurisdiction by the defendant in his pleadings."

Summary of this case from Green v. Massie
Case details for

Hudson v. Kline

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY SHERIFF KLINE, DEPUTY SHERIFF JOHN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Apr 11, 2008

Citations

Civil Case No. 06-cv-01946-LTB-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2008)

Citing Cases

Slack v. Jacob

But the plaintiffs' counsel argued that we could not now consider this question of jurisdiction; that the…

Salamone v. Keiley

Whilst it is settled, as was contended at bar by counsel for the appellee, that if a bill does not state a…