DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof dismissing the cause of action to recover damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 insofar as asserted against the defendant City of Newburgh and substituting therefor a provision granting the plaintiff's motion for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability on that cause of action insofar as asserted against that defendant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the appellant, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, for a trial on the issue of damages.

The plaintiff alleged that she was improperly strip-searched in a police station in the City of Newburgh. Strip-searches of arrestees charged with misdemeanors or other minor offenses violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution unless there is a reasonable suspicion that the arrestee is concealing weapons or contraband based on the crime charged, and the circumstances of the arrest (see, Walsh v. Franco, 849 F.2d 66; Weber v. Dell, 804 F.2d 796, cert denied sub nom. County of Monroe v. Weber, 483 U.S. 1020; Masters v. Crouch, 872 F.2d 1248, cert denied sub nom. Frey v. Masters, 493 U.S. 977; Ward v. County of San Diego, 791 F.2d 1329, cert denied sub nom. Duffy v. Ward, 483 U.S. 1020). Moreover, municipalities are "persons" to whom 42 U.S.C. § 1983 applies (see, Monell v. Dept. of Social Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690), and they may be held liable if an official policy causes an employee to violate another's constitutional rights (see, Monell v. Dept. of Social Servs. of City of New York, supra, at 690).

In the instant case, the plaintiff was arrested for possessing an unlicensed dog, a violation of the City of Newburgh Code. Upon her arrest, she was taken to the police station where a matron searched her. A witness for the City of Newburgh testified that the plaintiff was asked to remove all her outer garments, and while her underwear was still on, she was asked to lift her bra and expose her breasts. The search was made pursuant to an official policy that provided for the strip-search of all arrestees detained in a cell. The record further indicates that neither the arresting officer nor the matron suspected that the plaintiff possessed any weapons or other contraband. Thus, the search was unreasonable and in violation of the plaintiff's Fourth Amendment rights, and the City of Newburgh is liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Therefore, the Supreme Court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion for a judgment as a matter of law against the City (see, e.g., Walsh v. Franco, supra; Weber v. Dell, supra; Masters v. Crouch, supra; Ward v. County of San Diego, supra), and we have modified the judgment accordingly.

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.