From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard v. Chase Cardmember Services

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 31, 2006
NO. 3-06-MC-069-N (N.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)

Summary

In Chase v. Hubbard, 99 Pa. 226, cited by appellee, we had subrogation in mind in rendering the decision, not personal indemnity.

Summary of this case from Ryon's Estate

Opinion

NO. 3-06-MC-069-N.

August 31, 2006


ORDER


After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court.


Summaries of

Hubbard v. Chase Cardmember Services

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Aug 31, 2006
NO. 3-06-MC-069-N (N.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)

In Chase v. Hubbard, 99 Pa. 226, cited by appellee, we had subrogation in mind in rendering the decision, not personal indemnity.

Summary of this case from Ryon's Estate
Case details for

Hubbard v. Chase Cardmember Services

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. HUBBARD, Plaintiff, v. CHASE CARDMEMBER SERVICES

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Aug 31, 2006

Citations

NO. 3-06-MC-069-N (N.D. Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)

Citing Cases

Willwerth v. Willwerth

It is a familiar rule that on an appeal in equity a judge's findings of fact, founded in part upon the oral…

Ryon's Estate

This is a very different thing from indemnity directly out of appellant and from establishing the rule that…