From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hrusa v. Bogdan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

December 27, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J. — Bifurcation.

PRESENT: WISNER, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND KEHOE, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendants' motion to bifurcate the trial. Issues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable issues that should be tried and determined separately unless plaintiff's injuries have an important bearing on the issue of liability ( see, Armstrong v. Adelman Automotive Parts Distrib. Corp., 176 A.D.2d 773). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that plaintiff's injuries are not probative of defendants' alleged negligence, and thus plaintiff failed to establish the applicability of that exception ( see, Guizzotti v. English, 273 A.D.2d 932; Loncz v. Blagrove, 254 A.D.2d 735).


Summaries of

Hrusa v. Bogdan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 27, 2000
278 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Hrusa v. Bogdan

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA HRUSA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICK DAVID BOGDAN, D/B/A ACADEMY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
718 N.Y.S.2d 776

Citing Cases

Wesselenyi v. Santiago

Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendants' motion to bifurcate the trial. As a general rule,…

Turnmire v. Concrete Applied Tech

Finally, we conclude that the court properly denied that part of the motion of URS seeking, in the…