From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guizzotti v. English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 16, 2000.

Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, O'Donnell, J. — Bifurcate Trial.

PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying the motion of defendant James Coyle and the cross motion of defendant Daniel J. English to bifurcate the trial. The general rule is that the issues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable and should be tried and determined separately ( see, Perez v. Millard Fillmore Hosp., 263 A.D.2d 957). Although an exception to the general rule arises when the injuries sustained by plaintiffs have an important bearing on the issue of liability and are probative in determining how the accident occurred, plaintiffs failed to establish the applicability of that exception ( see, Loncz v. Blagrove, 254 A.D.2d 735, 736; Kotarski v. Kotecki Sons, 239 A.D.2d 909).


Summaries of

Guizzotti v. English

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Guizzotti v. English

Case Details

Full title:LOUISE GUIZZOTTI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF MARK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
711 N.Y.S.2d 807

Citing Cases

Wesselenyi v. Santiago

Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendants' motion to bifurcate the trial. As a general rule,…

Turnmire v. Concrete Applied Tech

Finally, we conclude that the court properly denied that part of the motion of URS seeking, in the…