reviewing the authorities and finding substantial doubt as to how a breach of fiduciary duty claim should be characterized
Summary of this case from Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. GrantNo. 89-1305.
June 18, 1990, October TERM, 1989.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 885 F. 2d 308.
reviewing the authorities and finding substantial doubt as to how a breach of fiduciary duty claim should be characterized
Summary of this case from Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Grantlisting appeal rights for preference eligible employees
Summary of this case from Taydus v. Cisnerosdistinguishing between a futures contract and security, and noting: "The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has authority to regulate trading of futures contracts (including futures on securities) and options on futures contracts."
Summary of this case from In re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.Full title:HOWELL ET AL. v. SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 18, 1990
Substantively, to satisfy the Boren Amendment's "reasonable and adequate" standard, Medicaid payments must…
Resolution Trust Corp. v. KerrAlthough some courts have determined that an action for breach of fiduciary duty sounds in contract rather…