From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoonsilapa, v. Immigration Naturalization

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 20, 1978
586 F.2d 755 (9th Cir. 1978)

Summary

reserving the question

Summary of this case from Lopez-Mendoza v. I.N.S.

Opinion

No. 77-1376.

November 20, 1978.

Michael F. Eng (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

Donna Fields Goldstein, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge.

Honorable Samuel P. King, Chief Judge, United States District Court, District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.


The Opinion [ 575 F.2d 735] is modified by adding footnote 1a to the Opinion at Slip Opinion page 1640 [575 F.2d at page 738] line 3 of part III, following the words, "home in December, 1974, were illegal," as follows:

"[1a] We thus do not decide whether the exclusionary rule is applicable to proceedings before the Immigration Naturalization Service."


Summaries of

Hoonsilapa, v. Immigration Naturalization

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 20, 1978
586 F.2d 755 (9th Cir. 1978)

reserving the question

Summary of this case from Lopez-Mendoza v. I.N.S.
Case details for

Hoonsilapa, v. Immigration Naturalization

Case Details

Full title:SOMSAK HOONSILAPA, PETITIONER, v. IMMIGRATION NATURALIZATION SERVICE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 20, 1978

Citations

586 F.2d 755 (9th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

Lopez-Mendoza v. I.N.S.

The question of the applicability of the exclusionary rule in deportation proceedings is one of first…

Violante-Gomez v. Holder

Violante-Gomez's contention that the I-130 visa petition and associated documents in the record demonstrating…