From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holsombach v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Feb 18, 2009
NO. 2:08CV00022-JMM-BD (E.D. Ark. Feb. 18, 2009)

Summary

holding that occasional failures to prevent contact between Kosher and non-Kosher food and items did not violate RLUIPA because the prison "employ[ed] reasonable measures to maintain a division between the main-line food preparation and Kosher food preparation"

Summary of this case from Roles v. Christensen

Opinion

NO. 2:08CV00022-JMM-BD.

February 18, 2009


ORDER


The Court has received the Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommended Disposition, the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety.

Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (docket entry #36) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Holsombach v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Feb 18, 2009
NO. 2:08CV00022-JMM-BD (E.D. Ark. Feb. 18, 2009)

holding that occasional failures to prevent contact between Kosher and non-Kosher food and items did not violate RLUIPA because the prison "employ[ed] reasonable measures to maintain a division between the main-line food preparation and Kosher food preparation"

Summary of this case from Roles v. Christensen
Case details for

Holsombach v. Norris

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY HOLSOMBACH ADC # 134723 PLAINTIFF v. LARRY NORRIS, et al…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 18, 2009

Citations

NO. 2:08CV00022-JMM-BD (E.D. Ark. Feb. 18, 2009)

Citing Cases

Yisrael v. Beasley

s are not sufficient to sustain his claim, we find no error in the district court's ruling."); Abdulhaseeb v.…

Rouse v. Hansen

, RLUIPA does not require perfection in accommodating religious beliefs. See Roles v. Christensen, No.…