From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hillman v. Hastings Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 4, 1994
631 N.E.2d 157 (Ohio 1994)

Opinion

No. 92-2330

Submitted March 22, 1994 —

Decided May 4, 1994.

APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 92AP-717.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION.

Clark, Perdue, Roberts Co., L.P.A., and Dale K. Perdue, for appellees and cross-appellants.

John C. Nemeth Associates, John C. Nemeth and David A. Caborn, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Hamilton, Kramer, Myers Cheek and James R. Gallagher, and Louis A. Jacobs, in opposition to modification of entry for amicus curiae, State Farm Insurance Companies.


The motion of appellant for a clarification is granted. Our entry ( 68 Ohio St.3d 238, 626 N.E.2d 73) is amended nunc pro tunc. The opinion of the court of appeals is vacated to the extent it deals with issues discussed in Savoie v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 500, 620 N.E.2d 809, and/or clarified in Newman v. United Ohio Ins. Co. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1204, 631 N.E.2d 157, decided today. We do not disturb the remainder of the opinion of the court of appeals.

This cause is remanded to the trial court to apply Savoie and Newman.

A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.

WRIGHT, J., dissents.

MOYER, C.J., not participating.


Summaries of

Hillman v. Hastings Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 4, 1994
631 N.E.2d 157 (Ohio 1994)
Case details for

Hillman v. Hastings Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HILLMAN ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. HASTINGS MUTUAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 4, 1994

Citations

631 N.E.2d 157 (Ohio 1994)
631 N.E.2d 157

Citing Cases

Williams v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

Similarly, while the Supreme Court in part has clarified the opinion in Savoie, the clarification does not…

Hobler v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.

applied to the matter sub judice because first, the express language of the parties' insurance contract…