Opinion
No. 3176
Opinion Filed November 18, 1913.
APPEAL AND ERROR — Brief — Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 Pac. vi), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Syllabus by Robertson, C.)
Error from County Court, Kingfisher County; John M. Graham, Judge.
Action by the City of Kingfisher against R. G. Hill. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Dismissed.
Cunningham Weiss, for plaintiff in error.
John T. Bradley, Jr., for defendant in error.
This appeal was filed in this court October 14, 1911. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 Pac. vi). Streeter v. McCoy, 34 Okla. 490, 126 P. 216; Thompson v. Murray, 34 Okla. 521, 125 P. 1133; Streeter v. Huene, 34 Okla. 491, 126 P. 216; Reliable Ins. Co. v. Newcomber, 34 Okla. 759, 127 P. 260; M., O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson, 34 Okla. 816, 127 P. 386; First Nat. Bank v. Baldwin, 34 Okla. 825, 127 P. 260; Snow v. Frye, 34 Okla. 826, 127 P. 422.
By the Court: It is so ordered.