From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Missouri, O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1912
127 P. 386 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 2187

Opinion Filed October 15, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Briefs — Dismissal. Where plaintiff in error fails to comply with the rules of this court, requiring it to serve a brief on counsel for defendant in error and at the same time to file fifteen copies of its brief with the clerk of the court, its case, on being reached for submission, will be dismissed.

(Syllabus by Sharp, C.)

Error from Pontotoc County Court; Conway O. Barton, Judge.

Action by C. F. Johnson against the Missouri, Oklahoma Gulf Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Dismissed.

Edward R. Jones, Duke Stone, and Leslie Maxey, for plaintiff in error.

Crawford Bolen, for defendant in error.


The petition in error in this case was filed in this court on December 16, 1910. Plaintiff in error has filed no brief. On January 24, 1911, by written stipulation, the time for filing brief was extended for 90 days therefrom. No brief, however, has at any time been filed, and upon authority of Douglas v. Clayton Townsite Co., 29 Okla. 9, 115 P. 1016, and the cases therein cited, the appeal should be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Missouri, O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1912
127 P. 386 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Missouri, O. G. Ry. Co. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:MISSOURI, O. G. RY. CO. v. JOHNSON

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 15, 1912

Citations

127 P. 386 (Okla. 1912)
127 P. 386

Citing Cases

Wallingford v. Wood

Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident…

Thompson v. Yount

Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident…