affirming a district court's granting motions to dismiss with prejudice claims against several judges based on judicial immunity
Summary of this case from Calkins v. Davis Sch. Dist.Nos. 87-1650, 87-2138.
August 27, 1992.
Appeal from the E.D.Okl.
AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART.
affirming a district court's granting motions to dismiss with prejudice claims against several judges based on judicial immunity
Summary of this case from Calkins v. Davis Sch. Dist.relying on Okusami, Brierly, and Cortec to affirm dismissal of an action with prejudice
Summary of this case from Perrian v. Coonsrelying on Okusami, Brierly, and Cortec to affirm dismissal of an action with prejudice
Summary of this case from Banks v. Katzenmeyerrelying on Okusami, Brierly, and Cortec to affirm dismissal of an action with prejudice
Summary of this case from Carbajal v. Serrarelying on Okusami, Brierly, and Cortec to affirm dismissal of an action with prejudice
Summary of this case from Woodstock v. GolderFull title:Heritage Mfg. Bldg. Supply, Inc. v. Abraham Development Co., Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Aug 27, 1992
That is, a plaintiff must either proceed pro se or be represented by a licensed attorney. 28 U.S.C. § 1654;…
Woodstock v. GolderThe dismissal of an action "pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is a resolution on the merits and is ordinarily…