Summary
holding that even though a case is properly removed to the Eastern District, venue is not necessarily frozen here and the Court may evaluate whether a transfer of venue is warranted
Summary of this case from DiClementi v. USAA Fed. Sav. BankOpinion
Case No. 4:13cv605
03-30-2015
JANET C. HENRY, et al. Plaintiffs, v. EDWARD JOSEPH HALLAHAN, et al. Defendants.
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 16, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. 20) be GRANTED and that this case be transferred to the Abilene Division of the Northern District of Texas.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue (Dkt. 20) is GRANTED and this case shall be transferred to the Abilene Division of the Northern District of Texas.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this the 30th day of March, 2015.
/s/_________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE