From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henis v. Egan

U.S.
Nov 30, 1953
346 U.S. 899 (1953)

Summary

recognizing the "rule that a counterclaim against a trustee in his individual capacity, where he has sued as a fiduciary only, is not permissible inasmuch as it is not a counterclaim against an `opposing party,' as contemplated by Rule 13"

Summary of this case from In re Adbox, Inc.

Opinion

No. 408.

November 30, 1953.


C A. 4TH Cir. Certiorari denied. Ralph Montogomery Arkush for petitioner. Thomas C. Egan, Francis E. Walter and David J. Mays for Egan et al.; and Thomas F. Boyle for Reeves et al., respondents. Reported below: 206 F. 2d 70.


Summaries of

Henis v. Egan

U.S.
Nov 30, 1953
346 U.S. 899 (1953)

recognizing the "rule that a counterclaim against a trustee in his individual capacity, where he has sued as a fiduciary only, is not permissible inasmuch as it is not a counterclaim against an `opposing party,' as contemplated by Rule 13"

Summary of this case from In re Adbox, Inc.
Case details for

Henis v. Egan

Case Details

Full title:HENIS ET AL. v. EGAN ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 30, 1953

Citations

346 U.S. 899 (1953)

Citing Cases

Steele v. Adler

Reliance on mere hypothetical probabilities in rejecting a claim is contrary to the presumption created by…

Wheatley v. Adler

I continue at the risk of some redundancy. Certain cases to which we have been pointed have no controlling…