From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. Borup

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

May, 1935.


Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Plaintiff, respondent, an employee of the New York Telephone Company, picked up a percussion cap which was among rubbish on the floor of a building in the course of construction and and owned by appellant, and scraped it with a pair of shears. The cap exploded and injured him. There is no evidence as to how the cap came to be on the floor. The proof shows that the building was being erected by a general contractor and that appellant took no part in the performance of the work other than such general supervision as was necessary to insure performance in accordance with the contract. Under the circumstances appellant would be liable only for some affirmative act of negligence. ( Joyce v. Convent Avenue Construction Co., 155 App. Div. 586; Silverman v. Binder, 130 id. 581, cited with approval in Besner v. Central Trust Co., 230 N.Y. 357, 362.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hayes v. Borup

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1935
244 App. Div. 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Hayes v. Borup

Case Details

Full title:OTTO HAYES, Respondent, and GEORGE HAYES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN BORUP…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1935

Citations

244 App. Div. 807 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Fragiacomo v. 404-6 East 88th St. Realty Corp.

For mere collateral acts of negligence only the contractor is liable ( Hyman v. Barrett, 224 N.Y. 436). If…