From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. County of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2015
CASE NO. CV 14-4784-JFK (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 14-4784-JFK (PJW)

02-13-2015

THOMAS HAWKINS III, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the motion to dismiss, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

After the Court issued its Report and Recommendation in this action, and during the period of time during which Plaintiff could file objections thereto, Plaintiff filed two motions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. In addition to evaluating them under Rule 60. the Court has also liberally construed them as objections to the Report and Recommendation. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976) (pleadings by pro se litigants are to be liberally construed).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss be granted and that the action be dismissed with prejudice.

DATED: 2/13/15

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hawkins v. County of Los Angeles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2015
CASE NO. CV 14-4784-JFK (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Hawkins v. County of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS HAWKINS III, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. CV 14-4784-JFK (PJW) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2015)